So I'm a bit confused, and I'm sure other people are too since I've seen a few people recently with hairless/double rex babies trying to figure this out too!
It was my understanding that if you have a Double Rex, both parents had to have been rexes or carry the recessive rex genes, hence the "double".
And Hairless is a recessive genetic trait that normal furred rats can carry and if both parents carry the gene, then some of their babies could end up as hairless. (like in the case of Bijou's single hairless baby)
Also "true" hairless being that they have absolutely NO hair at all. No eyelashes, tail fuzz, or even whiskers. But some "hairless" have very very curly whiskers, and some people say that those are actually double-rexes since they have hair.
But not ALL hairless rats are considered "true" hairless, but just because a "hairless" rat has fur doesn't mean that it's a double-rex either.
Did any of that make sense? Because it's all a bit confusing to me, I was hoping someone who knows about genetics could clarify!
It was my understanding that if you have a Double Rex, both parents had to have been rexes or carry the recessive rex genes, hence the "double".
And Hairless is a recessive genetic trait that normal furred rats can carry and if both parents carry the gene, then some of their babies could end up as hairless. (like in the case of Bijou's single hairless baby)
Also "true" hairless being that they have absolutely NO hair at all. No eyelashes, tail fuzz, or even whiskers. But some "hairless" have very very curly whiskers, and some people say that those are actually double-rexes since they have hair.
But not ALL hairless rats are considered "true" hairless, but just because a "hairless" rat has fur doesn't mean that it's a double-rex either.
Did any of that make sense? Because it's all a bit confusing to me, I was hoping someone who knows about genetics could clarify!