Joined
·
908 Posts
I know snakes aren't popular here, but I know of many member here that keep geckos and other reptiles (and a few snake owners are out there I'm sure).
The Lacey act has been in place for over 100 years now and was originally intended to stifle the trade in smuggled species and to protect the environment. It includes harsh penalties for those that traffic in wildlife across state lines.
All that said, this act is now being used by the animal rights groups to limit and eventually end ownership of some exotic animals. About 3 years ago, 3 species of large constrictor snakes were added, using the issue of Burmese pythons in the everglades as a pretense. They used "scientific evidence" from scientists affiliated with PETA and HSUS to claim that these species could become invasive in the US (when truly they can only survive in southernmost FL).
Last week, they added three more species of snakes, the rest of the anacondas and reticulated pythons... And almost added boa constrictors (one of the top 4 pet species in the US). I own boas myself... and I was extremely worried and nervous before the judgement was made public. If they had added boas to the list... I know that I'd have to give up my pets should I move out of state (and it's not easy to find a home for a large snake and there are not many rescues either).
Basically, they are chipping away at the species you can own, and gauging our reaction each time... If there is no or little uproar, they will add others to the list, until we can't own any reptiles or other exotics (keep in mind that both PETA and HSUS have the end goal of NO pet ownership, period. They are targeting the least kept pets first)).
At this point, the only hope going for those that own these species is USARK's lawsuit against the USFWS. They are using the dicey science as grounds for pursuing this and will be adding the new species to the suit, which has been ongoing for several years now.
If you own any reptiles, please consider donating to USARK or the lawsuit (they have a donation option to just put money toward the suit).
And, even if you don't own reptiles, but might want to one day please consider donating as well.
It has been too long that the pet community has been divided and owners of different species have been pitted against one another. They have come for the snakes today, but soon it will be the hamster and birds, the fish, the rodents, and then cats and dogs.
I will post a link to USARK's page here, they have other information there on legal issues across the country and on this matter. Please consider at least checking them out.
Thanks for your time!
The Lacey act has been in place for over 100 years now and was originally intended to stifle the trade in smuggled species and to protect the environment. It includes harsh penalties for those that traffic in wildlife across state lines.
All that said, this act is now being used by the animal rights groups to limit and eventually end ownership of some exotic animals. About 3 years ago, 3 species of large constrictor snakes were added, using the issue of Burmese pythons in the everglades as a pretense. They used "scientific evidence" from scientists affiliated with PETA and HSUS to claim that these species could become invasive in the US (when truly they can only survive in southernmost FL).
Last week, they added three more species of snakes, the rest of the anacondas and reticulated pythons... And almost added boa constrictors (one of the top 4 pet species in the US). I own boas myself... and I was extremely worried and nervous before the judgement was made public. If they had added boas to the list... I know that I'd have to give up my pets should I move out of state (and it's not easy to find a home for a large snake and there are not many rescues either).
Basically, they are chipping away at the species you can own, and gauging our reaction each time... If there is no or little uproar, they will add others to the list, until we can't own any reptiles or other exotics (keep in mind that both PETA and HSUS have the end goal of NO pet ownership, period. They are targeting the least kept pets first)).
At this point, the only hope going for those that own these species is USARK's lawsuit against the USFWS. They are using the dicey science as grounds for pursuing this and will be adding the new species to the suit, which has been ongoing for several years now.
If you own any reptiles, please consider donating to USARK or the lawsuit (they have a donation option to just put money toward the suit).
And, even if you don't own reptiles, but might want to one day please consider donating as well.
It has been too long that the pet community has been divided and owners of different species have been pitted against one another. They have come for the snakes today, but soon it will be the hamster and birds, the fish, the rodents, and then cats and dogs.
I will post a link to USARK's page here, they have other information there on legal issues across the country and on this matter. Please consider at least checking them out.
Thanks for your time!